CABRILLO COLLEGE PRESENTS

April 21st, 22nd, 23rd and 28th, 29th and 30th.
Fridays and Saturday at 8pm and Sundays at 3pm
Call 831-479-6168 for information
or 831-479-6331 for tickets
Tickets: $15, $12 Students/Seniors
Cabrillo College Theatre
6500 Soquel Drive in Aptos, bldng 200,
Click
HERE
for directions.
See preview publicity pictures from the play
HERE
Read director Sara Albertson's press release
HERE
This powerful play was written in 1955. It has been made into 3 movies and is as
relevant today, if not more so, than when it was first written.
The subject and teaching of evolution in the schools continues
to be an engrossingly controversial and important subject in America.
This is a play based on an important historic event. It inspires relisgious
and intelectual freedom and curiosity for both young and old at a time at
when it is most needed. It is a true masterpiece.
Sara Albertson's direction, Skip Epperson's set, and a cast of incredibly
powerful actors capture the spirit of this play in a manner that will
inspire Santa Cruz Theatre audiences for many years too come. It is an experienced
not to be missed.
"Totally Mesmerizing"; this was a quote from a professional actor after
attending opening night.
A HISTORICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE SCOPES TRIAL
by Marcelo Siero, President of
ARTISTS.COM
The Butler Act: Chapter 17, House Bill 185
(By Mr. Butler) Public Acts of Tennessee for 1925:
Section 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE,
That it shall be unlawful for any teacher of the Universities, Normals and
all other public schools of the State, to teach any theory that denies
the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and
to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals.
Laws like the Butler Act of Tennessee were being passed or proposed in
a dozen states in the 1920's. Many scientists and intelectuals were
concerned that America was legislating itself back into the Middle Ages.
At their prompting, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) decided to
make a test case to challenge these laws.
Unlike what the play seems to indicate, the case was artificially
brought into play. The American Civil Liberties Union had put an
ad in a Newspaper seeking a volunteer to violate the Butler Act as
a wy to challange the law. Several business men, thought that such
a trial might create opportunities for the sleepy town of Dayton,
Tennessee. They a recruited . John T. Scopes, a 24 year old,
unmarried physical education teacher in the Dayton High School for the task.
In the Spring of 1924 before the end of the school year he had
substituted for the regular biology teacher for two weeks, when
the latter was taken sick.

He was helping students
prepare for the finals and had given reading assignments from the textbook:
Hunter's Civil Biology, which covered, although rather briefly the
subject of evolution. Convincing John to volunteer
to become a test case for having broken this law took
some convincing since Scopes was not highly paid and was hoping to
sell cars over the summer vacation for a 5% commission in order to
attend Graduate School. After some prodding he accepted.
The Warrant for his arrest was sworn in front of Justice of the
Peace Arthur C. Benson -- except a Sheriff or a deputy was needed
for the arrest. When somebody mentioned that Deputy Perry Swafford
was nearby, Scopes volunteered to fetch him.
When the two arrived the ACLU representative rushed out with the
warrant and demanded that Scopes be arrested. On Saturday April 9,
Scopes appeared before three Justices of the Peace, the pertinent
passages about evolution were read from Hunter's textbook and the
defendant was released on 1000 dollar bond. Thus began the
two week long "Great Monkey Trial", the strangest, most whimsical,
and most publicized trial of the 20th century.
The trial was taken over by two well known rival celebrities:
Williams Jennings Bryan for the prosecution, and Clarence Darrow for
the defense. Bryan was an enormously popular man. He was known as
a man of the people because he was always standing up for the common
man. He had in fact come very close to being elected to the
Presidency of the United States three times. He was also well known
as a man of God. In constrast Darrow was, at that time often referred to
as the "Devil". His prior representation of two cold blooded murderers
(Leopold and Loeb), just a year before, had cast hime as
defender of the indefensible and provided the appropriate justifications
for such a title.
On July 10, 1925 the eight-day long trial opened in sweltering heat.
Indeed from the first day Darrow and Attorney General Ben McKenzie
of the prosecution discarded their jackets. Darrow with a keen sense
for publicity was pictured for posterity wearing his suspenders at
the trial.
The court room was packed full. Throughout the trial Bryan fanned
himself with a fan provided as a gift by a local funeral home.
Despite the heat, the court was packed full.
Press and radio were thoroughly represented. There was a major bustle
of activity throughout the trial. Most of the proceedings were
punctuated by lively audience participation, which the court was
unable (perhaps unwilling) to control. A prospective juror was a
Minister. When Darrow asked whether he preached for or against
evolution, his reply: "Of course, I preach against it" was received
with thunderous applause. Judge Raulston threatened to exclude
the public if the applause was repeated. This warning, however, was
not heeded or enforced since the record indicates that in the early
stages almost anything that Williams Jennings Bryan said was welcomed
with applause. All twelve men of the selected jury described themselves
as farmers, though four of them gave additional occupations
-- U.S. marshall, merchant's shipping clerk, cabinetmaker and carpenter.
One of them was illiterate.
The first great maneuver of the proceeding came when the defense
objected to Judge Raulston's custom of opening with a prayer.
This was not an uncommon custom for those days. The objection was
overruled.
The prosecution was aware that the defense was importing to
Dayton a number of distinguished scientists, who were intended to
serve as witnesses for the case. The prosecution made a motion that
all such expert evidence be excluded. The motion was resisted by
the defense which had gone to considerable effort and expense to
bring these scientists. Judge Raulston ruled in favor of the
prosecution and Darrow's witnesses were unable to testify.
The greatest excitement came to the proceedings when the defense called
Williams Jennings Bryan as a witness. Bryan was not subpoenaed and didn't
need to testify, he did so willingly, which would turn out to be a big
mistake.

Rivals face to face Darrow with William Jennings Bryan;
Scopes trial of 1925. Wide World Photos
Bryan, was the greatest loser in the trial as a result of this mistake.
Scopes had actually very little at stake in the trial. Darrow's
cross-examination and the scorn that Bryan received in the newspapers, specially from
H. L. Mencken's broadcast to the nation indicating that Bryan's time had passed.
It was said by some, in fact, that there was something cruel about the proceedings.
Bryan appeared trapped like a dumb animal. Bryan was a great orator, and held
his own for some time, but Darrow having greater intellectual keenness,
cornered Bryan and humilliated him.
A peculiarity of the cross-examination was that it took place without the presence
of the jury. The judge had only agreed to hear it to determine if the evidence was
admissible. For this reason freer rein was given to the questioning. After some
time the judge seeing this was not going well for Bryan ruled the evidence to be
inadmissible.
Knowing that Bryan might get a chance for a come back during the summation speech,
Darrow entered a guilty plea before the end of the trial, preventing Bryan from
doing so.
Bryan, who had prepared a well thought out rebuttal, was not able to
deliver it and felt cheated. He made the best he could of the situation by delivering an
eloquent speech the next day. Bryan died five days after the trial. The cause was
never entirely clear. Some ascribed it to overeating, since he known to be a glutton,
but most believe that, in fact, Darrow cross-examined Jennings Bryan to his grave.
The Scope's trial left much anger and bitterness in its wake. Mencken, the
newspaperman that spoke so strongly against Bryan was threatened of being lynched.
It was believed that the were members of the audience that were ready to shoot
Darrow during Bryan's cross-examination. In the end, not much was accomplished by
this trial from the standpoint of law. The Supreme Court of Tennessee reversed the
conviction on non-constitutional grounds in 1927. The ACLU which had contributed
$1400 to the defense fund published a four-page pamphlet on the trial with an
explanation of the Scope's defense. It would not be until 1968 that the
constitutional issue would be settled, when the United States Supreme Court held that an
Arkansas statute, which forbade the teachings Darwin's theory of evolution was
unconstitutional. The latter case, much like the 1925 Scope's trial was artificially
"set up" in order to challenge the law.
Bibliography:
"Darrow, A Biography", Kevin Tierney
"Center of the Storm", John T. Scopes and James Presley
"Clarence Darrow, A One-Man Play", David W. Rintels.
"Defender of the Faith", Williams Jennings Bryan. L.W. Levine.
"Clarence Darrow, A Sentimental Rebel", Arthur and Lila Weinburg.
|